☔ 200 Dpi Vs 300 Dpi

At 4800 dpi, printing a pixel resolution of 300 ppi gives you 16 dots in that direction to recreate the color intensity. In the other direction, 1200 dpi for the same 300 ppi gives you only 4 dots for recreating the color intensity. In this case, 4x16 gives you get a grid of 64 potential dots, which provides a color depth of 64 shades. EPSON WorkForce DS-6500 48 bit CCD Flatbed 1200 dpi ADF 600 dpi Duplex Document Scanner. Light Source: ReadyScan LED Scanning Speed: With ADF (letter) 200 dpi B/W Up to 25 ppm/50 ipm 200 dpi color Up to 25 ppm/50 ipm 300 dpi B/W Up to 25 ppm/50 ipm 300 dpi color Up to 25 ppm/50 ipm 600 dpi B/W Up to 6 ppm/12 ipm 600 dpi color Up to 4 ppm/8 ipm The 300 dpi images print well and reasonably quickly on existing laser printers, many of which are not capable of 400 or 600 dpi printing. The grayscale images that were heavily compressed with the JPEG algorithm were not favored because of the challenge at print time and the visibility of JPEG image artifacts. For instance, while a 203 thermal printer dpi can print up to 14 inches per second (IPS), a 300 dpi thermal printer can go as far as 12 IPS, and a 600 dpi resolution can print up to 6 IPS. This does however very much depend on the printer brand (manufacturer) and model, as these vary widely. So, when next you are on the lookout for the ideal Dpi is a print term and has no relation to the screen pixels. The more accurate term is "Pixels per Inch" It's actually instructions to the printer. A 100 x 100 px image will cover one inch of paper when printed at 100 ppi. Increase print resolution to 300 ppi and it will be about 1/3 x 1/3 of an inch. 72 ppi is a legacy term from the old 1984 IF you are setting dpi at output size, then yes, 300 dpi is appropriate. If you're setting dpi at original (1 x 1.5) size, then: If you're sure you'll never want to print bigger than (uncropped) 4x6, 1200dpi is about . right. 300 is too little, 3200 is overkill. If you want a quality 8x12, 2400 dpi is reasonable. I've also heard that using the native DPI can be beneficial as lower DPI is interpolated or something - the sensor is still working at native DPI but, for example, at 1/2 native DPI every other measurement is ignored. I was using 400 DPI and 3.0 sens but when I heard that I switched to 800 DPI (native for my mouse) and 1.5 sens. The difference between 300dpi and 72dpi is found in the amount of pixel information (or dots) for every square inch of the image you are viewing. The more dots/pixels the image contains, the sharper the image will print. When designing graphics for commercial printing purposes, your images should be 300 dpi. Web graphics and online photos are 1. Canon 20D, 8Mpixels - 3504x2336. At 72 dpi it is roughly 48"x32", not 10"x8". 2. Your hypothetical Nikon 2 page spread - 16"x10" at 300 dpi would be 4800x3000 pixels = 14.4 Mpixels. But what most important is that it is not important at all, as all the previous posters pointed out. Instead of 72 DPI, it is translates closer to 300 DPI that printers use as an industry standard. Now we will still use the digital measurement of pixels to adjust the photo on our computer but instead use 300 PPI resolution at the size it will be on printed material in inches. Easy right! Just change the resolution from 72 to 300 and good to go…. Thus, while 100 dpi produces 10,000 dots per square inch, 200 dpi produces 40,000 (see table below). Dots Per DPI Square Inch 100 10,000 200 40,000 300 90,000 600 360,000 900 In other words, when you resize an image with photo editing software, set the dimensions of the image to the print size first (e.g. 5 x7) and then set the resolution to 300 pixels/inch. The lower the pixels per inch, the blurrier the image will appear on paper. Depending on your printer, you could get acceptable results from 200-300 pixels/inch. 50Fc.

200 dpi vs 300 dpi